Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Proof that life doesn't begin at conception


“Life begins at conception.”  This is a phrase that has been used repeatedly by many, including a recent Presidential candidate and two Vice-Presidential candidates in 2012.  On The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, former Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee indicated that he believed life begins at conception.  Rallies have recently been held where the protesters waved placards saying life begins at conception.





Plants.  There is no conception in the plant world, yet most people would agree that plants are alive.  Some may argue that there is pollination, which could be considered a surrogate for conception, but that doesn’t address the issue of plants that reproduce vegetatively.  Strawberry plants are an example of plants that don’t necessarily reproduce through pollination and seeds.  They frequently spread via runners which produce new plants without ever being pollinated.

One might say they meant only animals when they talk about life beginning at conception.  Except, there are animals that reproduce by parthenogenesis.  There is no genetic material exchanged between a male and female to produce viable offspring with parthenogenesis.  Snails, aphids and whiptail lizards are examples of animals that reproduce without conceiving.  But these animals are life and alive.

The life begins at conception crowd might be hollering now claiming that they meant human life begins at conception.  
Explaining the basics of biology that should have occurred to this group of people when they were in the sixth grade is rather feeble.  Conception occurs when a sperm cell from a male of the species meets an egg cell of a female of the same species.  There is one way for conception to occur and that is when both the sperm cell and the egg cell are living.  If either one, or both, of those cells are dead, conception does not happen.  The cells involved in conception have to be alive in order for conception to occur.  Life begins before conception, as the cells involved in conception have to be alive.

When does life start?  Many biologists will tell you, and Mike Huckabee as well, if he is listening, that life began 4.6 billion years ago.  And life is a continuum, an ongoing process that has neither a beginning nor end.  Where would you draw the line for where life begins when life is a series of changes that are passed from one organism to its offspring through many biological processes?  It would be very difficult to put a finger on any one process and say here is where life begins.

If life begins at conception then one can say that Jesus did not live.  Christians such as Mr. Huckabee believe in what has been written about in the Holy Bible, and that book says that Jesus mother was a virgin.  She had not had sex, therefore conception could not have happened.  If life begins at conception, then Jesus never lived.

Dolly the sheep was never alive, if you believe that life begins at conception.  Dolly was the first mammal cloned by humans.  There was no conception involved in the development of Dolly, so it follows that Dolly was never alive.  This is one more example of proof that life doesn’t begin at conception.  Life is a continuum.  

What happens when humans are cloned.  It is a matter of time before people are cloned and there is no conception involved in the human development.  If somebody killed a cloned person would they get off of any charge of murder because they could claim that the clone was never alive?  What about an entire army of clones?  Killing them, at least to people who believe life begins at conception, would not be a crime, and you could send them into battle with no qualms about any of the “deaths”. 

There is no single point where life begins.  It occurs continuously, changing from a living single cell to a multicellular organism.  Whether the living organism is a human, a snail, or a plant, life progresses through a series of changes.  There is no one point where life begins, for it is an ongoing process with no beginning, and perhaps no ending, as evidenced by the living cells of Henrietta Lacks sixty years after her death.


 "There never was a time when you or I did not exist. Nor will there be any future when we shall cease to be." 
--  Bhagavad Gita

11 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I recommend a name change for this blog. Something a little snappier and a little less cryptic. Otherwise, you probably won't get any decent comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your high school biology teacher must be extraordinarily tough. Flunking the Huckster because he messed up on one concept out of the hundreds presented in a high school biology class is mighty severe. Typically 60% is passing, so a student could completely miss dozens of concepts and still easily pass.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It appears the arguments presented in the blog vis-a-vis when life begins are semantic (literally?). Can there be much doubt that the actual substantive argument in the abortion debate is about the life of a unique fetus in a uterus, and not about fauna and flora in general? The question is reasonably narrow: e.g., when did that fertilized egg become Kent Hammond Coe? And when is it OK for a doctor to intervene (usually mechanically) and stop the process of Kent Hammond Coe formation? Obviously it is mostly illegal to stop KHC formation at 60 years after conception. (except maybe in Texas). And still illegal at a year after conception. 9 months? 8 months? 7 months? 5 months? 3 months? 5 weeks?
    Huckabee argues 1 second.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Life begins when I rise each morning, glad of it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. And then there are the aboriginal cultures who believed that life began when the mother first felt her baby kick, who in turn tells the local shaman, who then connects the baby to the spot on the earth where the mother felt the first kick. Forever more the baby's fate and identity is tied to this one spot on the earth, which is also tied to the tribes story line. Or as the author suggests, a continuum of lives.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So lets take the concept that life is a continuum one step further. Life has developed a process to create multicellular organisms with varied genetic traits that allows it to interact with its environment in which those most attuned to their environment survive and thrive, while those not so much struggle. Ok, given that life is made up of earthly elements - carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, etc. (some might say they are cosmic elements) and once formed as a multicellular organism, lets say a 61 year old man, does that man really have free will or is that man just responding to his environment as his genetic make-up has dictated from day one?

    ReplyDelete